Some questions I have for the report authors, journalists & PR people at the various companies:
- on the headline finding of the report - that "Four seconds is the maximum length of time an average online shopper will wait for a Web page to load before potentially abandoning a retail site." - the report data indicates a very different picture: 80% of dial-up users, and 68% of broadband users will wait longer than 4 seconds before leaving a Web site. Looking at the detailed data from the report, I can't see any way to arrive at an 'average' measure of 4 seconds. Neither the mean, mode or median values for the data come out at 4 seconds. The lowest figure I can arrive at is at least 5 seconds, and possibly quite a bit higher.
- Broadband users start to consider abandonment after less than 1 second in some cases (1% of broadband respondents). Dial-up users show a little more patience, starting to abandon the site after 1-2 secs of waiting (3%). Wouldn't this be a better way to report the findings? "Online shoppings start abandoning sites after 1 second of waiting"
- From the original report: "Roughly 75% of online shoppers who experience a site freezing or crashing, that is too slow to render, or that involves a convoluted checkout process would no longer buy from that site". The respondents were asked to indicate whether they would be 'less likely to buy from the retailer again online' - not whether they definitely would not. This is a significant difference in interpretation of the data, and leads to the sort of attention-seeking articles shown below.
How the article was reported elsewhere:
Slashdot: "Of course we all want webpages to load as fast as possible, but now research has finally shown it: four seconds loading time is the maximum threshold for websurfers. Akamai and JupiterResearch have conducted a study among 1,000 online shoppers and have found, among other results, that one third of respondents have, at one point, left a shopping website because of the overall 'poor experience.' 75% of them do not intend ever to come back to this website again. Online shopper loyalty also increases as loading time of webpages decreases. Will this study finally show developers of shopping websites the importance of the performance of their websites?"
What's wrong here:
- four seconds is not the maximum threshold for websurfers. 80% of dial-up & 68% of broadband users indicated they would typically wait longer than this for a page to load;
- 75% of respondents indicated they would be less likely to return to the site; not that they had no intention of returning;
- The report does not correlate an increase in online shopper loyalty to a decrease in webpage loading time: it indicated the converse (slower loading time correlates to decreased loyalty), which is not necessarily the same thing.
InformationWeek: "The survey found that more than one-third of online shoppers abandoned sites entirely whenever they suffered a poor experience. Some 75% of the online shoppers polled said they wouldn't be likely to use the sites in question after they had a poor shopping experience."
What's wrong:
- More than one third of dissatisfied online shoppers who also abandoned a site did so due to load times, errors or crashes. The percentage of abandonments due to all sources of dissatisfaction ('poor experience') was not reported, but is also presumably higher than one third.
- Again with the 75% of online shoppers (see above)
What's wrong:
- Again, 68% of broadband and 80% of dial-up users indicated in their survey response they would wait longer than 4 seconds for a page to load;
- Slow loading times was a source of dissatisfaction for 33% of respondents;
- 18% indicated they had abandoned a transaction due to the slow page loading on the site.
2 comments:
good research ...
Steve, you are a stats machine! I must remember to never mention any numbers to you without checking them three or maybe four times :)
[This mega-late comment is brought to you by someone cleaning up their aggregator]
Post a Comment